Opinion: The Parable of Lazarus and privatization

BY JAY WHIPPLE

In the Gospel of Luke, Jesus tells the story of a wealthy man who lived in comfort while a poor man named Lazarus suffered just beyond his gates. Though the rich man ignored Lazarus in life, he later found himself in torment, realizing too late that his selfishness had consequences beyond what he imagined.  

Today, many of the wealthy residents of Gilchrist Avenue face a similar moral test. By seeking to privatize roads, restrict access to public beaches, and shut out the broader community, they may believe they are protecting their way of life. But in doing so, they are merely shifting problems onto others – displacing inconvenience and discomfort rather than addressing it.  

The Illusion of Security

Some might argue that privatizing roads and restricting access to public spaces will preserve their peace, keep their neighborhoods safe, or maintain their exclusivity. But history tells a different story. When public spaces become walled off for the privileged few, resentment, division, and social strain follow.  

Restricting beach access does not eliminate overcrowding – it merely pushes the crowds to other residential and business districts. Cutting off roads does not prevent illicit behavior, if it exists – it simply moves it elsewhere. In seeking to create a haven for themselves, these residents may inadvertently contribute to the decline of the broader community, harming local businesses, alienating neighbors, restricting spiritual ministry and fostering division.  

A Shared Responsibility  

The parable of Lazarus warns against the moral blindness that can come with wealth. The rich man had the means to help Lazarus but chose to ignore his suffering. The residents of Gilchrist Avenue are in a similar position of privilege. They have benefited from a thriving community, public infrastructure, and natural beauty that belongs to everyone. It is neither fair nor ethical to claim these resources as their own while pushing the burden onto others.  

True security is not achieved by building walls but by fostering a sense of shared responsibility. Instead of restricting access, these residents could lead efforts to invest in sustainable, inclusive solutions – such as better infrastructure, environmental protections, and community engagement programs – that benefit everyone.  

In Jesus’ parable, the rich man begs for someone to warn his family so they do not make the same mistake. But the warning had already been given – through scripture, prophets, and moral conscience. Likewise, the residents of Gilchrist Avenue do not need another warning. They already have history, ethics, and community values to guide them.  

The choice is clear: will they choose generosity, inclusion, and long-term prosperity, or will they seal themselves off, only to face the inevitable consequences of social division and economic decline?

Lazarus still waits at the gate. Will they see him this time?  

Jay Whipple is a resident of Boca Grande.